Tulpa.info - tulpa-discussion

So it can be an unintentional RP of and RP

10:00 PM

Though, the other day, you were against premarital sex and concerned about cheating on your girlfriend, right?

10:01 PM

Hasn't this crossed you as a bit odd at any point?

no, it hasn't I know how it works in my head...can we please stay on topic

We are on topic.

This is on topic. It's uncomfortable, but sometimes it's best to face things head on than skirt around it

I just assumed that people where different at different times depending on what the situation demanded.

10:02 PM

If a person is horny, then they'll obviously not care as much about premarital sex.

That is a context personality, Andrew.

True @Deleted User

Premarital sex is fun, anyway

10:02 PM

Just enjoy life

10:03 PM

All while not hurting others of course

that being said, she is a tulpa and I don't see it the same as having sex with another physical human being, despite how everyone around here treats tulpas.

It's another person in your head, is it not?

I think that depends on what you think a tulpa is.

facepalm

10:03 PM

real personality =/= real physical human being

So, tell me, in your own words, what you think a tulpa is.

I've said it many times; A tulpa is a secondary personallity within one's head, to keep one company and help solve one's problems. They should be treated with love and respect as another person, but nonetheless are not entirely equal to a physical human being.

I'm not sure if that definition lines up with the established definition

10:06 PM

But I suppose that's up for debate

"They should be treated with love and respect as another person" "she is a tulpa and I don't see it the same as having sex with another physical human being" (edited)

10:06 PM

Idk if I'm misunderstanding but this doesn't seem to go together well

...I don't understand why this is so hard for you guys.

Why is she "secondary"?

10:07 PM

Why is her personality any different from your personality?

Do you always respond with projection of others not understanding when they point out holes within your reasoning?

Second personality? Not the original?

I would argue that they are physical human beings, since they do have a physical body, the one shared with the host. And if you do believe that they should be treated with the same respect as any other person, I do think that lines up well with your other views.

Despite what you all want to say, be politically correct and all, the reality is that a tulpa belongs to that person. They are a creation of that person, reside in that person's brain, and the only way they can leave is to disappate.

"Politically correct"

10:08 PM

wot

If you view a tulpa as property, you likely do not agree that they deserve respect as another person.

^

Your buzzwords are leaking - Tulpas can't leave unless if you really go out of your way for it really

~~guys, I sense a bit of hostility here. Every one chill.~~

10:08 PM

Property =/= Human being

Depends on where you live, Uganda have humans as property

Not very respectful, still.

Human beings can be property

They have the ability to think and create their own logic, but it is, at all points, subject to the host's authority

Hmm I guess you're right

10:09 PM

In all fairness

Hookay I was joking there let's not start saying that humans can be property

and if they lose their subjectivity to the host...it's because the host allowed them to

xD Yeahhh

which is fine

Slavery still exists, as shitty as it is.

10:10 PM

Sadly...

FFS THIS IS NOT SLAVERY

10:10 PM

My tulpa is a part of me

We're not saying it is

10:10 PM

People sell themselves to doms for kinky lifestyles.

why would I abuse myself?

Please, stop, Andrew.

They give ownership of themselves away freely.

Let's not.

Alright

10:10 PM

Okay, back to topic

Hopefully I can pitch in later, I have to head out with the others, see you guys!

all I wanted to know is how can I further seperate her voice and make it more distinct without focusing entirely on her

Cya

Keep forcing and keep narrating

I would suggest forcing more, she is still very, very young.

Way too young, 2 weeks is what it took for my first response even

10:12 PM

And it was a split second emotional response (edited)

It took me a month for Craig to even give me a verbal response

About the same here

It did take me around six months to respond for the first time, of course this may have been caused from isolation from other people creating tulpas.

And it was like, mere yes and no

I read all kinds of stuff about insta-tulpas and went ok makes sense but....I don't want to believe that I've been talking to myself for the last two weeks

I still had never learned possession, even though him and I were trying after about half a year of him being around

10:13 PM

Yeah same Feral

You're making progress, but maybe you have been to a bit of an extent

10:13 PM

Overreaching how far you've come that is

I do not believe instatulpas are much more than intrusive thoughts.

I mean...I have to wonder whether some people are simply more suited to creating tulpas then others

Possibly

No more has more of an affinity than others

I have been talking to myself and imagining logical responses since I was 7

Yes, some people likely are, but Rome was not built in a day.

that means I have over 15 years of self-talking experience (edited)

My host does the same, he still talks to himself but can differentiate who is who from tulpas and his own inner monologue

so....all I have to do is formulate a sentience for my responses and BOOM tulpa

You create sentience

I think we can all agree that you are making progress, but you might need to slow down a bit, seeing the rate of which it's heading

...what is a proper rate

10:17 PM

everybody refuses to give me a schedule

10:17 PM

so I made my own

There is none?

I don't do well with play-it-by-ear non-obvious shit

There isn't a "proper schedule".

Everybody is different?

I would rather have a long ass fixed schedule than this calvin ball shit

Give yourself enough time to learn more about Ikari's responses and help better differentiate your thinking from her own, until you feel comfortable probably

Unfortunately, what we want isn't necessarily the case - in this case, despite how useful it would be, there is no schedule.

making a schedule could be self-defeating

I think it's just believing that helps.

If that bothers you, that's unfortunate - and I'm sorry that is the case. Unfortunately, it also won't change that there isn't a schedule that can be made.